Risk Assessment and Lead Inspection

    All lead hazard control grant programs awarded by the OHHLHC require a combination Risk Assessment and Lead Inspection. So what's the difference? The table below shows the differences between the two types of investigations and why we require both to be done.

    What's the Difference between
    a Risk Assessment and a Lead Inspection?

    Analysis, Content or Use

    Risk Assessment

    LBP Inspection

    Combination

    Paint

    Deteriorated paint only

    Surface-by-surface

    Surface-by-surface includes deteriorated paint

    Dust

    Yes

    Optional

    Yes

    Bare Soil

    Yes, when locality indicates the possibility of soil lead hazards

    Optional

    Yes, when locally indicated

    Water

    Optional

    Optional

    Optional

    Air

    No

    No

    No

    Maintenance Status

    Optional

    No

    Optional

    Management Policies and Procedures

    Optional

    No

    Optional

    Review of Previous Paint Testing

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    Typical Uses

    1. Interim controls 2. Building nearing the end of expected life
    3. Sale of property or turnover
    4. Documentation of absence of lead hazards for insurance or state requirements

    1. Abatement
    2. Renovation work
    3. Weatherization
    4. Sale of property or turnover
    5. Remodeling or repainting

    1. Addresses presence of LBP and hazards in a comprehensive manner
    2. Generates data for decision-making where both interim controls and abatement strategies may be used in building
    3. May be more cost-effective than separate investigations

    Final Report Generated

    Lead Hazard Control Plan including options for Interim Controls OR certification of LBP compliance

    Whether LBP is present and if so, where (lead concentrations for each surface tested)

    Presence and locations of LBP, recommendations for hazard control options