“The landlord shall, within thirty (30) days after HUD gives such notice, execute and deliver to HUD a warranty deed of conveyance to HUD as grantee conveying the said fee and interest and containing a covenant against the grantor's acts . . . .”
Generally, in NY State a warranty deed provides full protection to the grantee that no liens exist on the property and, if they do exist, that they will be the responsibility of the grantor. Thus, the Warranty Deed provides the most protection available to the grantee. Contrast this deed with a Bargain and Sale Deed with a covenant against the grantor’s acts, which only provides protection as to the grantors acts, not the acts of all previous owners.
I am working on a deal where the Landlord only wants to provide a Bargain and Sale deed. He argues that this is what HUD really intended, as they explicitly state that the warranty deed must contain a covenant against grantor’s acts (i.e., in NY it is redundant to ask for this covenant with a warranty deed).
Does HUD know what the drafter of this Addendum intended? If it was the strongest protection available in the state then I will ask that the language remain unchanged. If the intent was to collect what is most common in the industry then I would recommend that we allow for the revision to state a bargain and sale deed with covenant against grantor’s acts can be given.
- Log in to post comments